By the second quarter of any AFL Friday night, a large share of the crowd is looking down, not up. Phones are out across the stands and the lounge rooms, refreshing scores, checking fantasy points, and watching odds tick over in real time. That habit looks trivial from the outside. For the people who run football as a business, it has quietly rebuilt how the sport makes money.
A decade ago, the matchday economy ran on a familiar set of levers: gate receipts, memberships, food and beverage, signage, and a broadcast cheque renegotiated every few years. Those levers still matter. But the value of a football audience is now measured less by who is in the building and more by who is engaged on a device, for how long, and how often they come back during the week. The phone turned a three-hour event into a seven-day product, and the revenue model bent to match.
Broadcast money set the new baseline
The clearest signal of the shift sits in the rights market. The AFL’s current broadcast agreement, running from 2025 to 2031, is worth $4.5 billion, the largest sports media deal in Australian history. That works out to roughly $643 million a season, up from about $473 million under the previous arrangement. The increase did not come from selling more free-to-air games, since the number of matches on free TV stayed broadly the same. It came from digital and subscription rights, from streaming on 7plus, Foxtel and Kayo, and from the assumption that a football audience can be monetised across screens long after the final siren.
Once broadcasters and leagues started pricing the audience that way, everyone selling to that audience had to follow. Wagering operators were among the fastest to move. As live, in-play markets became the core product, betting activity shifted almost entirely onto mobile, with the large majority of Australian wagers now placed on a phone rather than at a counter. Most of that volume runs through a wave of Australian betting sites built around in-game markets, where a user can move on a result between bounces without leaving the couch. For football, that created a fresh and aggressive bidder for the same thing broadcasters were now selling: a viewer’s continuous, second-by-second attention.
Attention became the product everyone bid for
This is where the matchday economy gets crowded. During a single game, a club app wants the fan checking team news, a fantasy platform wants line-up changes before lockout, a broadcaster wants the stream open through the breaks, and an operator wants a bet placed before the next stoppage. They are all competing for one scarce resource, which is the time a fan will spend on a phone while the ball is in play.
The commercial weight of that competition shows up in advertising. According to the communications regulator’s advertising placement and spending report, more than 504,000 gambling ads aired on metropolitan television in the year to April 2023, and just over half of them came from online betting providers. That concentration is not random. It tracks live sport, because live sport is the one product left that reliably gathers a large audience at a known time, which is exactly what an in-play operator needs. The same logic explains why airlines, banks, telcos and beverage brands keep paying premium rates for the same windows. Football sells certainty of attention, and certainty has become rare.
For a fuller picture of how mobile and streaming reshaped the league’s wider commercial model, footyindustry’s earlier analysis of the sport’s move from the sidelines to smartphones sets out how revenue diversified well beyond the gate, from fantasy platforms to daily games to international subscriptions.
The regulatory variable
None of this sits still. The same ad concentration that funds part of the modern game has put football’s commercial model under political pressure, with ongoing debate about capping or restricting gambling advertising around live sport. For clubs and leagues, that is a planning problem, not a side note. A material slice of broadcast and sponsorship value is tied to a category that may face tighter rules, sitting alongside more durable partners in banking, telecommunications, retail and travel. Anyone modelling future rights value has to price in the chance that one of the biggest bidders for football’s attention is eventually told to bid more quietly.
It is worth keeping betting in proportion, though. It is one input here, not the whole story. Fantasy competitions, daily games, memberships sold through apps, and subscription streaming all draw on the same digital shift. The codes that have managed the change best are the ones treating the phone as the main venue and the stadium as the flagship event, rather than treating the stadium as the entire business.
Where it leaves the game
The matchday economy did not shrink when it moved to the phone. It expanded, fragmented, and got harder to manage. Revenue lines multiplied, audiences became measurable by the minute, and the contest for a fan’s attention now runs all week instead of for three hours on a Saturday. The clubs and codes that understand they are in the attention business, and not only the football business, are the ones setting the price for everyone else.
About the Author
